Saturday, February 03, 2007

Truth? We can't handle the truth.

Consider the following statement:-

Most neo-Nazis are white men.

There is nothing particularly inflammatory about it. It is a plain statement of fact, devoid of implication and relatively easy to prove.

I, as a Caucasian male, do not feel offended by this statement, as I am confident of the fact that I am not a neo-Nazi, however brutishly I might behave at the football.

Now consider the case of teacher Andrew McLuskey, who has been sacked from Bayliss Court Secondary School, Slough. During a religious education class he made the statement that ‘most suicide bombers are Muslim’.

Call me Mr. Stupid but I cannot see what is controversial or offensive about that statement. First off, it is true, from whatever angle you look at it. From my recollection, the number of Sikhs blowing themselves to bits in recent years has been relatively low.

Second, it carries no implications whatsoever. It is a statistic with no opinion attached to it. If pupils in McLuskey’s predominantly Muslim class were uncomfortable with it, surely that reflects their own interpretation of the facts and not his.

There is, just maybe, a case to be argued that it was too sensitive a statement to make in front of a class of schoolchildren. But if we, as a society, are to talk openly about any difficult issue, we must not be afraid of facts, only of their misuse.

Yes, most suicide bombers these days are Muslim. But this does not mean that Christians, Jains, Hindus or Buddhists should behave any differently towards Muslims than they do toward one another. Nor does it mean that terrorism is a problem exclusively of Islam.

As far as we know, McLuskey never implied otherwise, but has become another victim of our collective cultural insecurity about what we are allowed to say. His pupils will suffer if his replacement does not display the same degree of honesty and integrity that won him the sack.

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Was that all the teacher was sacked for? As with many statements, there well be far more behind the story than we know.

I mean in what context was the comment made? He is a religious studies teacher after all. If he was implying that there was something inherent in Islam that made people become suicide bombers than the comment would justifiably cause offence.

At any rate, as far as I know, suicide bombings were a tactic that in recent years began with the Tamil Tigers, who are a majority Hindu group...

Ferdi

6:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ferdi, you are indeed the voice of reason.

Do we know that most suicide bombers are muslim? It seems plausible, but I couldn't swear to it.

Assuming it's true, it may well not be a good idea to say this in the present climate of prejudice against muslims and their increasing feelings of being under siege in our society. But, of course it does depend on the context (which we don't really have much detail of).

Free speech is good, but an inalienable right? Shouting "fire" in a packed theatre?

Okay, but what if it's true you're thinking. Things can be true and still not very clever to say loudly and publicly.

It's a lot like the "most muggers are black" comment someone famous famously (and probably inadvisably) made a few years ago back when black people were the most disproproportionally stopped and searched in the UK. Now it's muslims and those who look like they might be musilms.

harry

1:20 PM  
Blogger Rob Davies said...

Good comments lads, and thanks for the info about the Tamil Tigers, Ferds.

I agree, we need to know the context in which the comment was made before passing judgment really.

As for not being a good idea to say it, i'm not sure about that. Parroting the statistic that most muggers are black envelops far more people in the 'spectrum of suspicion'. It makes people fear groups of black kids on the street when there is no need to.

THe concession that most suicide bombers are Muslims does no such thing. No-one in their right mind (or at least within the realms of sensible debate) is going to suspect any Muslim they see of being a suicide bomber. We're talking about a much more minority activity.

Given the relatively small number of identifiable plots/successful bombings, surely it is quite easy to detect a pattern, no matter how meaningless that pattern might be.

1:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmm, not sure about the 'no-one is going to suspect any Muslim they see to be a suicide bomber'.

I've heard far too many comments along the lines of 'I saw a shady looking man with a big rucksack today on the Tube and wondered what he was up to' for my liking.

The parallel with the 'most muggers are black' comment is a rather good one. We do currently live in a climate where the majority are in fear of Muslims.

And while it can't be denied that there are Muslims out there who want to cause untold death and destruction, a climate of fear is only likely to cause more distrust and alienation in the Muslim community.

How many tragedies like de Menezes or farces like Forest Gate to we need to make us take a little more measured approach when discussing Muslims in the press?

Incidentally, wasn't it entirely unacceptable for the Home Office to brief the press in the way they did after the raid in Birmingham on the men suspected of plotting to behead a British soldier? Whatever happened to the principle of innocent until proven guilty?

Ferdi

1:04 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Completely agree with Rob Davies on this. Why on earth should the fact that a minority of people expressing bigoted prejudice against Muslims stop us from stating obvious facts.

It's a completely ridiculous and anti-intellectual argument - typical, in fact, of the wishy washy left - that, because a subject is sensitive, we should simply hide under the table and not attempt to tackle or discuss it because we're frightened to cause offence.

What the wishy washy liberals simply don't understand is one basic fact. By not discussing this problem or alluding to it, we don't help Muslims. In fact, we hinder them. If we make no attempt to take on the extremists on the fringes of Islam, we do no service to moderate Muslims who look to the British political class and educational leaders to make a stand on it.

I appreciate that I've deviated from the subject a little here, but the morally autistic view of the Left that we should embrace socialist democracy on the one hand but - on the other - be so politically correct that we are paralysed from taking on totalitarian extremists on on the other (or befriend them, in the case of Ken Livingstone), is typical of the type of nonsense which, it appears, saw this teacher dismissed in the first place.

1:35 AM  
Blogger Rob Davies said...

Thanks David, but have to admit that i might be seen as a wishy washy liberal by some. Thought it only fair to warn you.

5:27 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Oh well, nobody's perfect I suppose...
Great blog, by the way. Really enjoying reading it. Thought the piece today on US censorship was great - I wanted to do a story on its myself for ToL, but was vetoed by the news editor...

8:03 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home